A proof of the HeineBorel Theorem
seminar class Active In SP Posts: 5,361 Joined: Feb 2011 
15022011, 12:28 PM
A proof of the HeineBorel Theorem Theorem (HeineBorel Theorem). A subset S of Ris compact if and only if S is closed and bounded. Proof. First we suppose that S is compact. To see that S is bounded is fairly simple: Let In = (−n, n). Then 1 [ n=1 In = R. Therefore S is covered by the collection of {In}. Hence, since S is compact, finitely many will suffice. S (In1 [ · · · [ Ink ) = Im, where m = max{n1, . . . , nk}. Therefore x m for all x 2 S, and S is bounded. Now we will show that S is closed. Suppose not. Then there is some point p 2 (cl S) \ S. For each n, define the neighborhood around p of radius 1/n, Nn = N(p, 1/n). Take the complement of the closure of Nn, Un = R\ clNn. Then Un is open (since its complement is closed), and we have 1 [ n=1 Un = R\ 1 \ n=1 clNn = R\ {p} S. Therefore, {Un} is an open cover for S. Since S is compact, there is a finite subcover {Un1 , · · · ,Unk} for S. Furthermore, by the way they are constructed, Ui Uj if i j. It follows that S Um where m = max{n1, . . . , nk}. But then S \ N(p, 1/m) = ?, which contradicts our choice of p 2 (cl S) \ S. Conversely, we want to show that if S is closed and bounded, then S is compact. Let Fbe an open cover for S. For each x 2 R, define the set Sx = S \ (−1, x], and let B = {x : Sx is covered by a finite subcover of F}. Since S is closed and bounded, our lemma tells us that S has both a maximum and a minimum. Let d = min S. Then Sd = {d} and this is certainly covered by a finite subcover of F. Therefore, d 2 B and B is nonempty. If we can show that B is not bounded above, then it will contain a number p greater than max S. But then, Sp = S so we can conclude that S is covered by a finite subcover, and is therefore compact. Toward this end, suppose that B is bounded above and let m = supB. We shall show that m 2 S and m /2 S both lead to contradictions. If m 2 S, then since Fis an open cover of S, there exists F0 in Fsuch that m 2 F0. Since F0 is open, there exists an interval [x1, x2] in F0 such that x1 < m < x2. Since x1 < m and m = supB, there exists F1, . . . , Fk in Fthat cover Sx1 . But then F0, F1, . . . , Fk cover Sx2 , so that x2 2 B. But this contradicts m = supB. If m /2 S, then since S is closed there exists ε > 0 such that N(m, ε) \ S = ?. But then Sm−" = Sm+". Since m− ε 2 B we have m+ ǫ 2 B, which again contradicts m = supB. Therefore, either way, if B is bounded above, we get a contradiction. We conclude that B is not bounded above, and S must be compact. download full report http://math.utah.edu/~bobby/3210/heineborel.pdf 



Important Note..!
If you are not satisfied with above reply ,..PleaseASK HERE
So that we will collect data for you and will made reply to the request....OR try below "QUICK REPLY" box to add a reply to this pagePossibly Related Threads...  
Thread  Author  Replies  Views  Last Post  
Basic Proportionality Theorem  projectsofme  1  3,924 
09042016, 11:25 AM Last Post: mkaasees 

Bayes Theorem PPT  study tips  0  374 
08052013, 12:47 PM Last Post: study tips 

The Midpoint Theorem and its Converse  seminar tips  0  438 
17102012, 05:49 PM Last Post: seminar tips 

Pythagorean Theorem PPT  seminar flower  0  574 
13102012, 11:51 AM Last Post: seminar flower 