automatic speech recognition full report
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
project report tiger
Active In SP

Posts: 1,062
Joined: Feb 2010
01-03-2010, 07:20 PM

.ppt   Automatic Speech Recognition.ppt (Size: 832 KB / Downloads: 545)

Automatic Speech Recognition

Automatic speech recognition

¢ What is the task
¢ What are the main difficulties
¢ How is it approached
¢ How good is it
¢ How much better could it be

What is the task

¢ Getting a computer to understand spoken language
¢ By understand we might mean
“ React appropriately
“ Convert the input speech into another medium, e.g. text
¢ Several variables impinge on this (see later)

How do humans do it

¢ Articulation produces
¢ sound waves which
¢ the ear conveys to the brain
¢ for processing

How might computers do it

¢ Digitization
¢ Acoustic analysis of the speech signal
¢ Linguistic interpretation

Whatâ„¢s hard about that

¢ Digitization
“ Converting analogue signal into digital representation
¢ Signal processing
“ Separating speech from background noise
¢ Phonetics
“ Variability in human speech
¢ Phonology
“ Recognizing individual sound distinctions (similar phonemes)
¢ Lexicology and syntax
“ Disambiguating homophones
“ Features of continuous speech
¢ Syntax and pragmatics
“ Interpreting prosodic features
¢ Pragmatics
“ Filtering of performance errors (disfluencies)


¢ Analogue to digital conversion
¢ Sampling and quantizing
¢ Use filters to measure energy levels for various points on the frequency spectrum
¢ Knowing the relative importance of different frequency bands (for speech) makes this process more efficient
¢ E.g. high frequency sounds are less informative, so can be sampled using a broader bandwidth (log scale)

Separating speech from background noise

¢ Noise cancelling microphones
“ Two mics, one facing speaker, the other facing away
“ Ambient noise is roughly same for both mics
¢ Knowing which bits of the signal relate to speech
“ Spectrograph analysis

Variability in individualsâ„¢ speech

¢ Variation among speakers due to
“ Vocal range (f0, and pitch range “ see later)
“ Voice quality (growl, whisper, physiological elements such as nasality, adenoidality, etc)
“ ACCENT !!! (especially vowel systems, but also consonants, allophones, etc.)
¢ Variation within speakers due to
“ Health, emotional state
“ Ambient conditions
¢ Speech style: formal read vs spontaneous

Speaker-(in)dependent systems

¢ Speaker-dependent systems
“ Require training to teach the system your individual idiosyncracies
¢ The more the merrier, but typically nowadays 5 or 10 minutes is enough
¢ User asked to pronounce some key words which allow computer to infer details of the user™s accent and voice
¢ Fortunately, languages are generally systematic
“ More robust
“ But less convenient
“ And obviously less portable
¢ Speaker-independent systems
“ Language coverage is reduced to compensate need to be flexible in phoneme identification
“ Clever compromise is to learn on the fly

Identifying phonemes

¢ Differences between some phonemes are sometimes very small
“ May be reflected in speech signal (eg vowels have more or less distinctive f1 and f2)
“ Often show up in coarticulation effects (transition to next sound)
¢ e.g. aspiration of voiceless stops in English
“ Allophonic variation

Disambiguating homophones

¢ Mostly differences are recognised by humans by context and need to make sense
Itâ„¢s hard to wreck a nice beach
What dimeâ„¢s a neckâ„¢s drain to stop port
¢ Systems can only recognize words that are in their lexicon, so limiting the lexicon is an obvious ploy
¢ Some ASR systems include a grammar which can help disambiguation
¢ Discontinuous speech much easier to recognize
¢ Single words tend to be pronounced more clearly
¢ Continuous speech involves contextual coarticulation effects
¢ Weak forms
¢ Assimilation
¢ Contractions

Interpreting prosodic features

¢ Pitch, length and loudness are used to indicate stress
¢ All of these are relative
“ On a speaker-by-speaker basis
“ And in relation to context
¢ Pitch and length are phonemic in some languages


¢ Pitch contour can be extracted from speech signal
“ But pitch differences are relative
“ One man™s high is another (wo)man™s low
“ Pitch range is variable
¢ Pitch contributes to intonation
“ But has other functions in tone languages
¢ Intonation can convey meaning

¢ Length is easy to measure but difficult to interpret
¢ Again, length is relative
¢ It is phonemic in many languages
¢ Speech rate is not constant “ slows down at the end of a sentence

Template-based approach

¢ Hard to distinguish very similar templates
¢ And quickly degrades when input differs from templates
¢ Therefore needs techniques to mitigate this degradation:
“ More subtle matching techniques
“ Multiple templates which are aggregated
¢ Taken together, these suggested ¦

Rule-based approach

¢ Use knowledge of phonetics and linguistics to guide search process
¢ Templates are replaced by rules expressing everything (anything) that might help to decode:
“ Phonetics, phonology, phonotactics
“ Syntax
“ Pragmatics

Statistics-based approach

¢ Can be seen as extension of template-based approach, using more powerful mathematical and statistical tools
¢ Sometimes seen as anti-linguistic approach
“ Fred Jelinek (IBM, 1988): Every time I fire a linguist my system improves
¢ Collect a large corpus of transcribed speech recordings
¢ Train the computer to learn the correspondences (machine learning)
¢ At run time, apply statistical processes to search through the space of all possible solutions, and pick the statistically most likely one
Machine learning

¢ Acoustic and Lexical Models
“ Analyse training data in terms of relevant features
“ Learn from large amount of data different possibilities
¢ different phone sequences for a given word
¢ different combinations of elements of the speech signal for a given phone/phoneme
“ Combine these into a Hidden Markov Model expressing the probabilities

The Noisy Channel Model

¢ Use the acoustic model to give a set of likely phone sequences
¢ Use the lexical and language models to judge which of these are likely to result in probable word sequences
¢ The trick is having sophisticated algorithms to juggle the statistics
¢ A bit like the rule-based approach except that it is all learned automatically from data


¢ Funders have been very keen on competitive quantitative evaluation
¢ Subjective evaluations are informative, but not cost-effective
¢ For transcription tasks, word-error rate is popular (though can be misleading: all words are not equally important)
¢ For task-based dialogues, other measures of understanding are needed

Comparing ASR systems

¢ Factors include
“ Speaking mode: isolated words vs continuous speech
“ Speaking style: read vs spontaneous
“ Enrollment: speaker (in)dependent
“ Vocabulary size (small <20 ¦ large > 20,000)
“ Equipment: good quality noise-cancelling mic ¦ telephone
“ Size of training set (if appropriate) or rule set
“ Recognition method

Remaining problems

¢ Robustness “ graceful degradation, not catastrophic failure
¢ Portability “ independence of computing platform
¢ Adaptability “ to changing conditions (different mic, background noise, new speaker, new task domain, new language even)
¢ Language Modelling “ is there a role for linguistics in improving the language models
¢ Confidence Measures “ better methods to evaluate the absolute correctness of hypotheses.
¢ Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) Words “ Systems must have some method of detecting OOV words, and dealing with them in a sensible way.
¢ Spontaneous Speech “ disfluencies (filled pauses, false starts, hesitations, ungrammatical constructions etc) remain a problem.
¢ Prosody “Stress, intonation, and rhythm convey important information for word recognition and the user's intentions (e.g., sarcasm, anger)
¢ Accent, dialect and mixed language “ non-native speech is a huge problem, especially where code-switching is commonplace
itee mehrotra
Active In SP

Posts: 1
Joined: Sep 2010
27-09-2010, 06:35 PM

plz give me detailed description of this report as early as possible
Active In SP

Posts: 1
Joined: Mar 2011
29-03-2011, 10:07 PM

Thank you for your entire effort on this web page. Betty takes pleasure in setting aside time for internet research and it is easy to see why. We all learn all relating to the lively medium you render both useful and interesting information via this blog and as well inspire response from website visitors about this subject matter while our daughter has always been learning a great deal. Enjoy the remaining portion of the year. Your doing a tremendous job. ellipticals for home
seminar paper
Active In SP

Posts: 6,455
Joined: Feb 2012
13-03-2012, 12:34 PM

to get information about the topic"speech recognition project and implimentation source code in c#" related topic refer the link bellow and implimentation

Important Note..!

If you are not satisfied with above reply ,..Please


So that we will collect data for you and will made reply to the request....OR try below "QUICK REPLY" box to add a reply to this page
Tagged Pages: speech emotion recognition ppt, full seminar report on speech recognition pdf, automatic speech recognition tutorial, bit error rate approach 2012 full project report for m e pdf, robust speaker recognition in noisy conditions report, voice reconization, automatic speech recognition seminar report,
Popular Searches: voice emotion recognition ppt, thread speech recognition using dsp full report, automatic speech recognition technology, introduction to speech recognition seminar report, aspiration, bit error rate project, bainbridge mass spectrograph ppt,

Quick Reply
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  digital image processing full report computer science technology 40 47,542 08-03-2014, 12:52 PM
Last Post: aumsree
  solar power satellite full report computer science technology 30 33,570 28-02-2014, 07:01 PM
Last Post: sandhyaswt16
  electronic nose full report project report tiger 15 17,760 24-10-2013, 11:23 AM
Last Post: Guest
  smart pixel arrays full report computer science technology 5 8,069 30-07-2013, 05:10 PM
Last Post: Guest
  smart antenna full report computer science technology 18 22,514 25-07-2013, 01:55 PM
Last Post: livon
  speed detection of moving vehicle using speed cameras full report computer science technology 14 22,612 19-07-2013, 04:40 PM
Last Post: study tips
  speech recognition full report computer science technology 17 22,786 14-05-2013, 12:28 PM
Last Post: study tips
  global system for mobile communication full report computer science technology 9 8,475 06-02-2013, 10:01 AM
Last Post: seminar tips
  satrack full report computer science technology 10 17,449 02-02-2013, 10:53 AM
Last Post: seminar tips
  Wireless Battery Charger Chip for Smart-Card Applications full report project topics 8 7,542 28-01-2013, 03:02 PM
Last Post: varna prasad